Correct the official Winehq packages will be targeting 10.13 so for that it’s a moot point.
The thing is if wine still “officially” supports down to 10.8 how to handle the missing functions, I’d go with using a third party implementation that would then make needing a newer SDK a moot point.
On 8/30/21 2:54 PM, Dean Greer wrote:
> We’d proposed that for the prebuilt packages as it’s PITA to build
> libraries that are compatible with the lower versions of macosx, however
> the library I mentioned to you prior already covers this and more missing
> functions.
Maybe I'm missing something, but compatibility libraries are a moot
point if this function is available in 10.13 and we're requiring 10.13,
right?