[Bug 2332] 16-bit application fails due to regression in NE-module handling
Wine Bugs
wine-bugs at winehq.org
Fri Jul 16 07:45:43 CDT 2004
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2332
------- Additional Comments From saulius.krasuckas at elst.vtu.lt 2004-16-07 07:45 -------
Created an attachment (id=628)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=628&action=view)
difference between two outputs introduced by the patch [1].
sorry for an ugly diff. now the differences are more clear as i've synched
(unified handle numbers), cleaned and compared outputs with some script:
#!/bin/bash
RPRFX=.simplified
SRCS=led2w.*patch
for SRC in $SRCS; do ( \
cat $SRC | \
awk '{ \
gsub( \
"4083[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]", \
"4083xxxx"); \
gsub( \
"405[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]", \
"405yyyyy"); \
gsub("0x70", "0x6c"); \
gsub( \
"4161[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]", \
"4161zzzz"); \
gsub("0x7c", "0x74"); \
gsub("0x90", "0x88"); \
gsub("0x68", "0x64"); \
gsub("0x94", "0x8c"); \
skip2=skip; \
skip=index( \
$0, \
"GENERIC_READ FILE_SHARE_READ OPEN_EXISTING"); \
if((skip==0) && (skip2==0)) print \
}' \
> $SRC$RPRFX \
); done
diff -u \
led2w.before_the_patch.simplified \
led2w.after_the_patch.simplifiedsec
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
More information about the wine-bugs
mailing list