[Bug 10050] New: oleaut32 and ITypeInfo::Invoke arguments
wine-bugs at winehq.org
wine-bugs at winehq.org
Mon Oct 15 17:22:05 CDT 2007
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10050
Summary: oleaut32 and ITypeInfo::Invoke arguments
Product: Wine
Version: 0.9.47.
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-ole
AssignedTo: wine-bugs at winehq.org
ReportedBy: gabmoa at yahoo.it
I'm trying to see an application (a cnc simulator/manager called ZFlash) in
wine. It is a quite big VB6 application and I hope one day (not so distant)
will run in linux. There are strange (for me :) errors:
...
ab},x=0,y=0,f=0,0x33e8b8), partially implemented.
fixme:ole:OleLoadPictureEx
(0x1451a0c,3134,1,{7bf80980-bf32-101a-8bbb-00aa00300cab},x=0,y=0,f=0,0x33f17c),
partially implemented.
fixme:ole:OleLoadPictureEx
(0x1460794,2110,1,{7bf80980-bf32-101a-8bbb-00aa00300cab},x=0,y=0,f=0,0x33f530),
partially implemented.
fixme:ole:OLEPictureImpl_SaveAsFile (0x1d94008)->(0x21ed868, 0, (nil)), hacked
stub.
fixme:ole:OLEPictureImpl_Render type -1 not implemented
fixme:ole:OLEPictureImpl_Render Not quite correct implementation of rendering
icons...
HERE IS THE 'STRANGE' LINE
fixme:ole:_invoke unsupported number of arguments 70 in stdcall
fixme:ole:OLEPictureImpl_Render type -1 not implemented
fixme:ole:OLEPictureImpl_Render Not quite correct implementation of rendering
icons...
fixme:ole:OLEPictureImpl_Render Not quite correct implementation of rendering
icons...
fixme:ole:OLEPictureImpl_Render type -1 not implemented
fixme:ole:OLEPictureImpl_Render Not quite correct implementation of rendering
... continue
In the wine sources:
/dlls/oleaut32.dll, file typelib.c
/* ITypeInfo::Invoke
DWORD _invoke(FARPROC func,CALLCONV callconv, int nrargs, DWORD *args) {
...
switch (callconv) {
case CC_STDCALL:
switch (nrargs) {
case 0:
res = func();
break;
case 1:
res = func(args[0]);
break;
...
case 30: ...
it finishes at 30, but the application seems to need also the 46 and 70 case.
I have added the two case and seems ok (it stops for another thing after this
but I think is another story)
My question is: 30 is considered only a big number or there is a reason?
Seems that this application need bigger numbers...
(wine 0.9.47 clean from sources)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
More information about the wine-bugs
mailing list