[Bug 21515] VENDOR_WINE vs VENDOR_ATI with xf86-video-ati

wine-bugs at winehq.org wine-bugs at winehq.org
Wed Feb 3 05:11:02 CST 2010


http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21515





--- Comment #25 from Henri Verbeet <hverbeet at gmail.com>  2010-02-03 05:11:02 ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> places where that info eventually becomes necessary. I suspect it would
> actually be better to split VENDOR_MESA into VENDOR_MESA_ATI,
> VENDOR_MESA_INTEL, VENDOR_MESA_SOFTPIPE(?), etc so that the actual card vendor
> information is carried through the wined3d_pci_vendor enumeration. Hopefully
> one of the wine devs will clarify which way to go.

I already mentioned this in a comment to the patch mentioned, but not here yet.
You're mostly right here, but rather than stuffing that all into a single
"vendor" field, we should split the field into "card vendor" and "GL vendor"
fields. The card vendor would be what we pass to the application, while the GL
vendor would be what we use internally to apply quirks etc.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.



More information about the wine-bugs mailing list