[Bug 21515] VENDOR_WINE vs VENDOR_ATI with xf86-video-ati

[wine-bugs at winehq.org]

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21515





--- Comment #78 from Cùran <debian at carbon-project.org>  2010-02-18 10:52:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=26299)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=26299)
Patch series from attachment 26247; slightly edited to be applicable with patch
or quilt.

(In reply to comment #77)
Is it possible, that during your edit you introduced some whitespaces into
attachment 26247? Because patch complained: "patch: **** Only garbage was found
in the patch input." And only after I ran the patches through:
> sed -e's/---  dlls/--- a\/dlls/g' -e's/+++  dlls/+++ b\/dlls/g' -e's/--- dlls/--- a\/dlls/g' -e's/+++ dlls/+++ b\/dlls/g'
(yes, only the first two replace commands were needed to make patch happy), I
could apply them. I'm using patch version 2.6, and patch was invoked by quilt.

Anyway, I've refreshed the patches with quilt, added an header to them and
attach them with this comment to the bug. This hopefully helps others to apply
the patches „out of the box". The patches in this attachment are -p1 formatted.
(Just to make sure: this comment isn't intended to give offence!)

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.