[Bug 21220] 16-bit app barks at wprocs.dll and then crashes
wine-bugs at winehq.org
wine-bugs at winehq.org
Sat Jan 2 11:41:45 CST 2010
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21220
--- Comment #8 from Austin English <austinenglish at gmail.com> 2010-01-02 11:41:44 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> >
> > Cause it means nothing and requires commenting from time to time anyway.
>
> It did mean suffix of the version string. And now it requires changing version
> field from time to time :(
>
> > > Now if someone forgets such temporarily decremented version setting in a bug
> > > report, the report states false fact. I consider this as a bug.
> >
> > It's not false. Version just indicates latest release before tested and
> > simplifies version based querying.
>
> In what way it does simplify? Lets assume another guy comes and sees version
> 1.1.35 in some regression report. Then he does regression hunt between v1.1.34
> and v1.1.35. What does he find? Just that v1.1.35 is good AND bad.
>
> It wouldn't call that simplification.
Often, regressions in git are fixed before a release is made. The solution is
to put the current git commit in the bug comments somewhere. Yes, it's not
perfect, but it's better than the previous solution where CVS/GIT could
describe current git, or a release that is 6 years old.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
More information about the wine-bugs
mailing list