[Bug 24101] Recursive CreateProcess() fails
wine-bugs at winehq.org
wine-bugs at winehq.org
Sat Sep 11 03:48:05 CDT 2010
--- Comment #31 from Ken Thomases <ken at codeweavers.com> 2010-09-11 03:48:03 CDT ---
Created an attachment (id=30697)
Version of dtruss which tracks file descriptors
I was inspired by this bug to put together something I've been thinking about
for a while. It's a dtrace-based script for tracking file descriptors.
It's built from the dtruss script that ships with Mac OS X. The important
change is that I've added a -F option to focus the tracing on file descriptors.
This limits the tracing to those syscalls which open/create or close fds. It
also reports the affected fd in the output.
One useful way to invoke it is: sudo dtruss -lsF -n wine >&/tmp/foo.log
The -l includes PID & TID in output. I have modified this to include a call
sequence number within a thread. That's useful because DTrace reports data out
of order. (Each CPU core fills its own buffer. When it's full, it sends it to
userland and starts another. So, the data from a given core is in order with
respect to itself, but may be out of order with respect to other cores.)
The -s includes stack traces for each call.
The "-n wine" traces processes whose executable name starts with "wine".
The -F restricts tracing to syscalls related to file descriptors. That
includes those that open or create them (open(), dup(), socketpair(), etc.),
the close() call, setting or clearing close-on-exec with fcntl(), and calls
which implicitly duplicate or close them (execve() for close-on-exec fds,
fork(), exit(), etc.).
For this bug, I have also made -F report syscalls which encounter EBADF, EPIPE,
EMFILE, and ENFILE.
Fds are printed as <pid>:<fd> (e.g. 6502:11) so that the same fd in different
processes can be easily distinguished. If something interesting happens to a
particular fd, you can search for that pattern to find what opened or closed
it. However, you might not find it that easily. For example, if an fd was
inherited by a child process from its parent, to find the creation point you'd
have to find the fork() to identify the parent and then look for the fd with
respect to that pid.
Harder still is when an fd is received via recvmsg. The script does trace the
fds sent by sendmsg, but it is not necessarily straightforward to identify
which sendmsg was responsible for a given recvmsg. One potential solution
might be to add a timestamp to the tracing. Dtruss supports that to some
extent (-d), but I'm not sure the timestamp it uses is coherent across
processes, threads, and CPU cores. I saw some weird results. I tried to add
the ability to use a different timestamp, but the resulting program exceeded
Anyway, I hope it helps.
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
More information about the wine-bugs