[Bug 26630] Please add an 'upstream' resolution

[wine-bugs at winehq.org]

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26630

--- Comment #4 from Austin English <austinenglish at gmail.com> 2011-04-03 17:40:18 CDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > > There is already one - INVALID, which translates to Not a Wine bug.
> > 
> > The idea I think is to have an UPSTREAM one to differenciate from invalid bugs
> > that *are* actually invalid. Upstream bugs are still valid.
> 
> The product is 'Wine', only bugs for the product should be considered as
> valid IMHO. What's wrong with adding something like '(NVidia driver bug)',
> 'Linux kernel bug' in the subject when closing a bug as invalid when
> appropriate? This doesn't even deserve a keyword IMO.

The bugs are not valid wine bugs, but should be distinguished from truly
invalid bugs. Yes, we could put it in the title, but that makes searching for
them a bit harder.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.