[Bug 28665] ntdll/directory test fails on FreeBSD9

[wine-bugs at winehq.org]

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28665

Austin English <austinenglish at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |notasas at gmail.com
         OS/Version|Linux                       |FreeBSD

--- Comment #4 from Austin English <austinenglish at gmail.com> 2011-10-18 19:25:07 CDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > I know these patches failed on brtfs, so still may be fs dependent.
> Maybe... but looking at his patches, he only worked on Linux (with Ext2,
> apparently). He didn't even touch the other implementations.

FWIW, I did some tests on Linux (all I have available atm). For all tests
(except as noted), wine-git and $WINEPREFIX where on the specified fs, which
was a loopback device.  The test was made by doing:
$ cd $HOME/blah/wine-git/dlls/ntdll/tests && make directory.ok
ext2: pass
ext3: pass
ext4: pass
ext4dev: pass
minix: only supports up to 64MB, can't fit wine-git. With a wineprefix there,
get errors for too long filenames, but directory.c passes
vfat: ../../../wine not found. fixing the wine build, fails later because
WINEPREFIX can't go there. with wine-git on a fat32 fs and wineprefix on ext3,
test passes
ntfs-3g/fuseblk: pass
jfs: pass
xfs: pass
reiserfs: pass

The brtfs bug is bug 28276. Could you try the patch there on OSX/hfs+?

CC'ing Grazvydas.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.