[Bug 27894] Inconsistent "for /L" parsing

[wine-bugs at winehq.org]

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27894

Jason Edmeades <us at edmeades.me.uk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |us at edmeades.me.uk

--- Comment #3 from Jason Edmeades <us at edmeades.me.uk> 2012-09-02 17:51:50 CDT ---
2 issues here...

1. for /L doesnt respect boundaries and often falls one short when using
'normal' numbers (should be <= and >= rather than > and <)

2. When no iterations occur, the rest of the for loop (the bit in brackets OR
the do xxxxx part) is left as the next command, so it steps on to try to
execute it

Patches submitted for both parts:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2012-September/117422.html
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2012-September/117421.html

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.