[Bug 39859] WineHQ packages for wine-gecko and wine-mono

wine-bugs at winehq.org wine-bugs at winehq.org
Sun Dec 27 04:24:33 CST 2015


https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39859

--- Comment #9 from Austin English <austinenglish at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Nikolay Sivov from comment #8)
> (In reply to Austin English from comment #7)
> > 
> > Mmm, good point. Perhaps have the gecko/mono package names match the
> > 'branch' name, e.g., wine-gecko-stable, wine-gecko-devel, wine-gecko-staging
> > (not ideal, I realize, but as long as they're in the same repo that may be
> > the best option). wine-gecko-staging may not be needed, at least until y'all
> > start patching gecko in addition to wine ;)
> 
> Package name could itself contain version, like wine-gecko1.2.3 and then
> main package could depend/suggest it. They don't change that often to have
> various flavors of it. Branch name seems a bit too much.

Sure, that's also an option. The advantage of using branch name is that the
dependency can be set once and doesn't have to be updated whenever mono/gecko
is updated.

Either way works, it's a minor implementation detail IMO.

-- 
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.



More information about the wine-bugs mailing list