[Bug 38926] WineHQ should build vanilla Wine binary packages of the biweekly releases for major distros

[wine-bugs at winehq.org]

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38926

--- Comment #12 from Henri Verbeet <hverbeet at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Dmitry Timoshkov from comment #11)
> That was just a question to clarify things, Henri, could you please be kind
> enough to answer both of the questions?

Quite frankly, I really get the impression you're acting in bad faith most of
the time recently. I suspect I'm not exactly the only person with that
impression, so if that's not your intention you may want to work on that.

The fundamental issue with those questions is that they have all kinds of
implied assumptions, somewhat along the lines of asking someone "Did you stop
beating you wife?". Regardless, the answers would be "No." and "While I can't
judge Sebastian's qualifications as a packager, there would be nothing
inherently wrong with that scenario." respectively.

And to "clarify" a bit more, your questions seem to imply I somehow don't want
Sebastian building packages. I suppose that comes from the same kind of
sentiment as I referred to in comment 1, but I said no such thing. What I
pointed out in comment 6 was that I think it would be preferable to have the
packages built and hosted on WineHQ infrastructure instead of on
fds-team/pipelight/wine-compholio/wine-staging infrastructure, or on
CodeWeavers infrastructure for that matter.

-- 
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.