[Bug 38926] WineHQ should build vanilla Wine binary packages of the biweekly releases for major distros

[wine-bugs at winehq.org]

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38926

--- Comment #15 from Austin English <austinenglish at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Henri Verbeet from comment #14)
> (In reply to Austin English from comment #13)
> > Frankly, I think both of you have been quite brash lately (moreso on
> > wine-devel, but on bugzilla as well). I personally think everyone (not just
> > the two of you) could stand to take down the aggressiveness a notch and try
> > to speak/negotiate in good faith.
> 
> Clearly I should have been smart like everyone else and just ignored this
> bug report. My bad, won't happen again. I do sincerely hope everyone keeps
> that in mind the next time people wonder why certain threads on wine-devel
> don't get any replies, or why some people don't get any feedback on their
> patches.

That doesn't really seem 'good faith' to me. There was no need for sarcastic
comments when I was simply pointing out that the behavior by wine developers in
general could use improvement. It shouldn't be a matter of commenting harshly
or not at all. That sort of attitude has been cited quite a few times from
potential developers as a reason for not wanting to (continue to) contribute,
and is something that we should all strive to change.

I'll leave it at that, given that this topic has been discussed plenty on
wine-devel and I'd rather discuss it there or at Wineconf.

-- 
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.