[Bug 38575] https://bugs.winehq.org/enter_bug.cgi should list Distribution package bugtrackers, for example, for Fedora.

[wine-bugs at winehq.org]

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38575

--- Comment #5 from Linards <linards.liepins at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Austin English from comment #4)
> (In reply to Rosanne DiMesio from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Austin English from comment #1)
> > > http://wiki.winehq.org/Bugs has a warning not to file bugs for these sort of
> > > things, but as with other warnings, many users ignore.
> > > 
> > 
> > In the case of Fedora, I think most users aren't even aware that they are
> > using wine-staging. The package is named "wine," not "wine-staging," and
> > looking at the console output posted yesterday in bug 30608, I don't see the
> > warning about not reporting bugs here that used to be part of the build.
> 
> Apparently that only shows on the first launch of a process in a prefix; if
> another program was started and wineserver was running, launching a second
> process won't show that warning (or it was manually removed).
> 
> But yes, I agree; Fedora could and should make that distinction more visible
> to its users. E.g., their wiki doesn't mention staging, and directs users to
> WineHQ's bug tracker:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Wine?rd=AndreasBierfert/Wine

Well, the starting point for you could be to do this ( from the wiki ):

"Updates-Testing

If you use the version of wine in the updates-testing repository then please
log into bodhi and comment on the build, including any problems that may be in
the packaging, naming, or elsewhere. The build needs positive karma to be
pushed to the updates repository."

Also note, that page has not been update from more than a year.(In reply to
Rosanne DiMesio from comment #3)
> (In reply to Linards from comment #2)
> 
> > 
> > You mean this; You tested with a clean Wine directory (default location:
> > "~/.wine", z: drive -> / link exists, no DLL overrides).'?
> > Maybe someone update it with note that it also applies to non-patched Wine
> > builds? '
> 
> You didn't read far enough; the page already addresses that: 
> 
> "You haven't modified Wine in any way (i.e. you are using a prepackaged
> binary without any custom patches or modifications) or built from the
> official WineHQ source by doing: "./configure ; make depend ; make")"

Oh, my apologies, Mis. Yes, it is addressed. Thank you.

-- 
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.