[Bug 39674] 3Dmark03, 05, 06 not started "Systen Info Error" (double regression)

[wine-bugs at winehq.org]

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39674

--- Comment #9 from Sergey Isakov <isakov-sl at bk.ru> ---
Yes, next step
get most recent wine
~~~
$ git describe head
wine-1.8-rc1-89-g4a315cd
~~~

Revert this commit
~~~
$ patch -p1 <patch-b6710.txt 
patching file configure
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] y
Hunk #1 succeeded at 973 with fuzz 2 (offset 9 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 17372 with fuzz 1 (offset -93 lines).
patching file configure.ac
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] y
Hunk #1 succeeded at 2713 with fuzz 1 (offset -109 lines).
The next patch would create the file dlls/bthprops.cpl/Makefile.in,
which already exists!  Assume -R? [n] y
patching file dlls/bthprops.cpl/Makefile.in
The next patch would create the file dlls/bthprops.cpl/bthprops.cpl.spec,
which already exists!  Assume -R? [n] y
patching file dlls/bthprops.cpl/bthprops.cpl.spec
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
File dlls/bthprops.cpl/bthprops.cpl.spec is not empty after patch, as expected
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
dlls/bthprops.cpl/bthprops.cpl.spec.rej
~~~

Compile and run.
It works!!!!
There is again a line in log
~~~
fixme:process:GetLogicalProcessorInformationEx (65535,0xaf6050,0x8beb54): stub
~~~

Full prove!
What else I can do for this bug?
I don't know a theory how it works. Probably the authors of the
dlls/kernel32/process.c may light the question.
Namely
 * Copyright 1996, 1998 Alexandre Julliard

-- 
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.