[Bug 46099] Star Citizen not loading after implementation of WaitOnAddress () in wine

wine-bugs at winehq.org wine-bugs at winehq.org
Wed Dec 5 17:58:47 CST 2018


https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46099

--- Comment #52 from rawfox <rawfox at freenet.de> ---
ah i see(In reply to Zebediah Figura from comment #51)
> (In reply to rawfox from comment #50)
> > (In reply to Zebediah Figura from comment #49)
> > > (In reply to rawfox from comment #48)
> > > > Looks like only the v2 patches got approved.
> > > > The other 2 futex fixes are not in, resulting in bad game performance.
> > > > They can be applied to the latest wine commit.
> > > > What now ?
> > > 
> > > These have been submitted: https://source.winehq.org/patches/data/155645
> > > 
> > > If you'd like to open a new bug report for the performance of SC and to
> > > track that patch, please feel free.
> > 
> > Thats over my horizon, sorry, but it looks different to this
> > https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=62897
> > and this
> > https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=62902
> > 
> > 1st was val = *futex;
> > 2nd was val = __atomic_load_n(futex, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST); <- this is working
> > good
> > 3rd now val = interlocked_cmpxchg( futex, 0, 0 );
> 
> Right; __atomic_load_n() isn't strictly portable; I just used it as a quick
> proof-of-concept (since all modern compilers should support it).
> interlocked_cmpxchg( futex, 0, 0 ) is portable and should give the same
> guarantees wrt. memory ordering.
> 
> > In wine-staging you added a futex condition patch what touches sync.c .
> > I removed that locally here and added the two missing patches from above
> > that are not yet in wine. That way i can patch it all together with
> > wine-staging.
> 
> That's for a different function; see bug 46208 and bug 45524.

Ah ok, i see.
Well, when the 2 missing patches are in wine-staging, instead of the
futex-condition one you wrote for those bugs, then the game works wonderful
while it performes terrible on a vanilla wine now.

Can you bring the https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=62897 and
https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=62902 patches together into that
futex condition patch currently in wine-staging what you did for the bugs you
mentioned ? That would solve everything ^^

-- 
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.



More information about the wine-bugs mailing list