[Bug 48243] DirectX 9 SDK "rtpatch.exe" fails (no support for rectangular and triangular patches)

WineHQ Bugzilla wine-bugs at winehq.org
Mon Dec 9 10:42:42 CST 2019


https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48243

--- Comment #11 from Olivier F. R. Dierick <o.dierick at piezo-forte.be> ---
Hello,

I don't know why you people insist on breaking the rules, but whatever, since
you're questioning me publicly here, I'll reply by the same means, until you
cease.

(In reply to Austin English from comment #10)
> (In reply to Olivier F. R. Dierick from comment #9)
> > 2. Excerpt from https://archive.org/about/:
> > 
> > "Anyone with a free account can upload media to the Internet Archive. We
> > work with thousands of partners globally to save copies of their work into
> > special collections."
> > 
> > Anyone can upload anything and make it available to the public, so it's
> > equivalent to a generic filesharing website.
> 
> AFAIK the main use is mirroring things that are already public. Do you have
> evidence that a random person can replace a binary from http://example.com
> with their own? That's the first I've heard such an allegation.

I've never heard such an allegation either, except from you, right now.

The excerpt is taken from the archive.org website itself.
Are you denying facts to make a point?

Nowhere did I say, or for the matter is written on archive.org, that anyone can
replace a binary from http://example.com with their own.

Straw man argument.

> They allow other uploads as well, but that's a separate feature from the
> wayback machine. As far as I'm concerned, however, the first case it's
> legitimate, same as, e.g. Google cache 

Nobody is discussing the wayback machine feature here.

Had you checked the linked download on archive.org, you would have seen that it
is an upload by a user 'wobajk', or maybe you did, and are deliberately missing
the point.

Do you know who user 'wobajk' is or where he got is redistributables from? I
don't.

> Anyway, if you're suggesting a change/discussion of that policy, please
> start a thread on wine-devel.

Nobody is discussing a change/discussion of a WineHQ policy here.

You may find me stubborn, rude or whatever, but I'm only trying to enforce the
already existing rules and policies in the face of people breaking them, and
you people nit pick and question that.

I don't know what's wrong with you. Am I somehow undesirable to you? Do you
think I'm doing it wrong? You can tell me privately. Remember that these pages
are public and my identity is visible. You make your arguments public at your
own risk, as I do mine.

There is no matter that I want to discuss with you, but if anyone has something
to say to me not related with this bug, there is a button to send me an email.
Please, use it.

Regards.

-- 
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.



More information about the wine-bugs mailing list