[Bug 48783] Wine Tahoma is missing many glyphs
WineHQ Bugzilla
wine-bugs at winehq.org
Mon Apr 6 23:13:53 CDT 2020
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48783
--- Comment #6 from Nguyen Chinh Huu <huupoke12 at gmail.com> ---
After some testing and inspection, I have some questions:
1. I noticed that that W10's shipped Tahoma is not fully metric-compatible with
the Tahoma in Wine (Wine Tahoma only fully metric-compatible with the Tahoma in
the tahoma verb which can be downloaded from winetricks). Why MS not keeping it
fully metric-compatible with the previous version of Tahoma?
2. As I see, W10's Tahoma doesn't contain bitmap glyphs. Is it necessary for
Wine Tahoma to have bitmap glyphs? And I thought that the .sfd are the source
files for fonts, but Wine tahoma.sfd only contains bitmap fonts, and the vector
fonts is only in tahoma.ttf. So if I want to contribute to Wine Tahoma (vector
font),
I have to create a git commit for a binary file (tahoma.ttf)? I don't think
using git to track binary files is a good idea. And do I have to also to make
change to the same glyphs for the bitmap font?
3. As I see, the vector font tahoma.ttf is based on Bitstream Vera fonts (the
bitmap font tahoma.sfd seems to be also somewhat to be based on it, but many
glyphs are self-created?). So if I want to contribute more glyphs to Wine
Tahoma, is it fine if I take the glyphs from DejaVu fonts (DejaVu changes seems
to be in a public domain and another one license for some glyphs which is very
similar with Bitstream Vera font license).
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
More information about the wine-bugs
mailing list