[Bug 43629] Evernote 6.3.3.3502 can't create note without native wininet

[WineHQ Bugzilla]

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43629

Anastasius Focht <focht at gmx.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Evernote 6.6.4.5512 can't   |Evernote 6.3.3.3502 can't
                   |create note without native  |create note without native
                   |wininet                     |wininet
                URL|https://evernote.en.uptodow |https://web.archive.org/web
                   |n.com/windows/download/1208 |/20161006015426/cdn1.everno
                   |233                         |te.com/win6/public/Evernote
                   |                            |_6.3.3.3502.exe
                 CC|                            |focht at gmx.net

--- Comment #2 from Anastasius Focht <focht at gmx.net> ---
Hello Fabian,

--- quote ---
adding stable download link.
--- quote ---

https://evernote.en.uptodown.com/windows/download/1208233

Unfortunately many of these third-party software mirror services, such as
softpedia.com, uptodown.com, cnet.com etc. can't be considered "stable". They
definitely drop old versions. There are few sites such as oldversion.com,
filehippo.com, filehorse.com which seem keep all old downloads but they don't
mirror all kinds of software. Even then I wouldn't trust them and rather
find/create a snapshot via archive.org

In this case I went as follows, remembering we already have quite a number of
Evernote bugs:

https://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?bug_file_loc=archive.org%20evernote&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=STAGED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=CLOSED&list_id=740317&product=Wine&query_format=advanced

(search all open/closed bugs which contain 'evernote' and 'archive.org' in the
URL field)

One of the results returned the following archive.org URL(s):

https://web.archive.org/web/20200403152332/http://cdn1.evernote.com/win6/public/Evernote_6.24.2.8919.exe

Using that pattern execute CDX API query on archive.org to figure out if the
CDN from the snapshot URL has any matching/similar versions:

--- snip ---
$ wget
http://web.archive.org/cdx/search/cdx?url="cdn1.evernote.com/win6/public/*" -q
-O - | grep application/ | grep 6.3.3

com,evernote,cdn1)/win6/public/evernote_6.3.3.3502.exe 20160930075250
https://cdn1.evernote.com/win6/public/Evernote_6.3.3.3502.exe
application/octet-stream 200 KWUOS5RMEVPDZX2WEXIKMLLYHJRS6WFL 99767744
com,evernote,cdn1)/win6/public/evernote_6.3.3.3502.exe 20161006015426
https://cdn1.evernote.com/win6/public/Evernote_6.3.3.3502.exe
application/octet-stream 200 KWUOS5RMEVPDZX2WEXIKMLLYHJRS6WFL 99763695
com,evernote,cdn1)/win6/public/evernote_6.3.3.3502.exe 20161026103545
https://cdn1.evernote.com/win6/public/Evernote_6.3.3.3502.exe
application/octet-stream 200 KWUOS5RMEVPDZX2WEXIKMLLYHJRS6WFL 99763686
com,evernote,cdn1)/win6/public/evernote_6.3.3.3502.exe 20201209093028
https://cdn1.evernote.com/win6/public/Evernote_6.3.3.3502.exe
application/octet-stream 200 KWUOS5RMEVPDZX2WEXIKMLLYHJRS6WFL 99841073
com,evernote,cdn1)/win6/public/evernote_6.3.3.3502.exe 20201226033631
https://cdn1.evernote.com/win6/public/Evernote_6.3.3.3502.exe
application/octet-stream 200 KWUOS5RMEVPDZX2WEXIKMLLYHJRS6WFL 99841042
--- snip ---

I've selected:

https://web.archive.org/web/20161006015426/cdn1.evernote.com/win6/public/Evernote_6.3.3.3502.exe

$ sha1sum Evernote_6.3.3.3502.exe 
55a8e9762c255e3cdf5625d0a62d783a632f58ab  Evernote_6.3.3.3502.exe

$ du -sh Evernote_6.3.3.3502.exe 
98M    Evernote_6.3.3.3502.exe

One starting point would be to closely check the built-in application tracing
'activity log' under 'Help' menu when using builtin vs. native. There might be
also differences when running the app under Windows. Just replacing one
component with native doesn't necessarily mean it works as intended. Sometimes
it goes through a different error handling/recovery path, resulting in "seems
to work".

Regards

-- 
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.