[Bug 52951] New: gdi32:font - test_GetGlyphOutline() fails on "VL Gothic" in Wine

[WineHQ Bugzilla]

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52951

            Bug ID: 52951
           Summary: gdi32:font - test_GetGlyphOutline() fails on "VL
                    Gothic" in Wine
           Product: Wine
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: x86-64
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: gdi32
          Assignee: wine-bugs at winehq.org
          Reporter: fgouget at codeweavers.com
      Distribution: ---

gdi32:font - test_GetGlyphOutline() fails on "VL Gothic" in Wine:

font.c:4885: Test failed: expected 36, got 19 (VL Gothic:136)
font.c:4903: Test failed: expected 36, got 19 (VL Gothic:136)

https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#gdi32:font

This begs two questions:

1. Is this a bug in the font, or a bug in the test?
2. Why does this happen on the debian11 (and debiant) VMs, but not on fg-deb64
(my development machine)?


On Debian VL Gothic is brought in by this package dependency chain:

libsane -> libpoppler-glib8 -> libpoppler102 -> poppler-data -(suggest)->
fonts-vlgothic

Interestingly poppler-data has alternatives to fonts-vlgothic one of which is
already installed:

   fonts-ipaexfont-gothic
   fonts-ipfont-gothic               (installed)
   fonts-ipafont-nonfree-jisx0208
   fonts-mona
   fonts-takao-gothic
   fonts-umeplus-cl
   fonts-vlgothic                    (installed)


But the reason for the difference is that fg-deb64 has the AR PL UMing CN font
(from the fonts-arphic-uming package) and not the TestBot VMs. The lack of
UMing also causes a test to be skipped on the TestBot VMs:

1: (IPAGothic:128)
2: (NanumGothicCoding:129)
font.c:4867: Tests skipped: Fixed-pitch TrueType font for charset 134 is not
available
4: (VL Gothic:136)


So I'm going to install fonts-arphic-uming on the TestBot VMs which should
swipe these two failures under the rug.
Note: I don't have information on how much this will increase the runtime (see
bug 51367) but it seems like it shouldn't be too bad.

-- 
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.