lostwages/wwn wn20060402_310.xml

[WineHQ]

ChangeSet ID:	23914
CVSROOT:	/opt/cvs-commit
Module name:	lostwages
Changes by:	wineowner at winehq.org	2006/04/03 00:16:19

Modified files:
	wwn            : wn20060402_310.xml 

Log message:
	Correctly attribute some quotes in WWN #310

Patch: http://cvs.winehq.org/patch.py?id=23914

Old revision  New revision  Changes     Path
 1.1           1.2           +3 -2       lostwages/wwn/wn20060402_310.xml

Index: lostwages/wwn/wn20060402_310.xml
diff -u -p lostwages/wwn/wn20060402_310.xml:1.1 lostwages/wwn/wn20060402_310.xml:1.2
--- lostwages/wwn/wn20060402_310.xml:1.1	3 Apr 2006  5:16:19 -0000
+++ lostwages/wwn/wn20060402_310.xml	3 Apr 2006  5:16:19 -0000
@@ -194,7 +194,8 @@ interested to hear your feedback on this
 that bit in next thread.  The other issue that provoked discussion concerned
 copyrights.  Here's my theory: there's no better way to get a bunch of
 software developers to care about law than to mention licenses or copyrights.
-Two comments stand out (keeping in mind IANAL nor do I play one on TV):
+Two comments stand out (keeping in mind IANAL nor do I play one on TV), the
+first from Scott Ritchie:
 </p><quote who="Scott Ritchie"><p>
 
 Fortunately, in order to enforce the license they don't really need
@@ -203,7 +204,7 @@ portions of the useful stuff.  Heck, Ale
 could probably be enough code to cover virtually the entire project.
 </p></quote>
 
-<p>And:</p>
+<p>And the second from Kai Blin:</p>
 <quote who="Kai Blin"><p>
 I'm still unsure about this "assigning the copyright to someone else"
 thing. I'm living in the EU, where the copyright is split into "usage