Running tests on windows
wine-devel at sun.consumer.org.il
Mon Apr 8 02:33:50 CDT 2002
Geoffrey Hausheer wrote:
>On Sunday 07 April 2002 20:29, you wrote:
>>"Geoffrey Hausheer" <i8e7fkwmsl1 at phracturedblue.com> wrote:
>>>So is there a better solution than the three I've listed?
>>>And why won't wine let me include 'windows.h', but under windows it is
>>Probably it would be better to use Wine headers to compile Wine tests.
>I disagree that this is a good idea. The idea is to test that wine behaves
>in the same manner as Windows does.
While I agree with that sentiment, I would like to point out that it may
be that WINE has an incorrect function definition that is backed up by
an incorrect declaration in the .h file. Such a situation may result in
compiling for wine with the wine headers working, as well as compiling
for Windows with the windows headers, but missing the binary
compatibility support goal.
More information about the wine-devel