mingwrap -> mingcc

[David Fraser]

Francois Gouget wrote:

>On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
>
>  
>
>>On December 18, 2002 03:36 pm, Francois Gouget wrote:
>>    
>>
>[...]
>  
>
>>>  winegcc
>>>      
>>>
>>Why not wgcc?
>>    
>>
>
>I had the impression that we were going away from just using 'w' as the
>prefix and more towards using 'wine'. So I'm proposing both forms.
>
>  
>
>>So I am OK with the following:
>>  wgcc
>>  mingcc
>>  wmingcc
>>    
>>
>
>I think the ones I prefer are 'wgcc' and 'winegcc'. In both cases we can
>add variants: wcl / winecl (Visual C++), wbcc / winebcc (Borland C++ if
>memory serves), etc.
>
>  
>
I'm all for winegcc and these variants. It's not that much longer to 
type, it's much
clearer (nobody's going to look at their /usr/bin directory and think 
'what's wgcc?'),
and most of the time it's going to be in a Makefile anyway.

David