Licensing, the question ...
Dimitrie O. Paun
dimi at cs.toronto.edu
Fri Feb 8 13:37:34 CST 2002
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Paul Millar wrote:
> IMHO, LGPL is too draconian for wine. How able something like LGPL, but
> with some extra clauses. So you have a LGPL license, but with the
> following (rough) clauses:
> 1. "Fair use" You are allowed to use any "small" part of the code under
> a BSD-style license agreement.
The purpose of this point is really dubious. No amount of "small" code in
wine can warrant the modification of a standard license like the
LGPL. There is already a large body of Wine code licensed under BSD, it's
> 2. "Embargo" You are allowed to refrain from making the source-code
> (of your modified wine source) available for a "fixed period",
> after which the licensed code must be made available.
This is a possibility -- it is significant enough to warrant the amendment
of the LGPL. Whether it's a good amendment, I can't say now.
More information about the wine-devel