Wine license change

Francois Gouget fgouget at
Sun Feb 10 13:09:18 CST 2002

On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Brett Glass wrote:

> At 07:31 PM 2/9/2002, David Elliott wrote:
> >The FSFs purpose and goals are irrelevant.
> They are quite relevant. Jeremy White said, in an earlier message, that
> he had consulted with Eben Moglen, the FSF's attorney. Moglen's goal is
> not to help the WINE project but to advance the FSF's agenda even if
> it hurts the WINE project.
> >The Wine developers purpose and goals are what is relevant.
> Both are relevant. If they adopt the FSF's license, the WINE developers
> will be advancing the FSF's agenda at their own expense.

   As you yourself admitted you are not a Wine devlopper. You may pose
yourself as a 'potential developper' to try to gain legitimacy, but the
truth is you are nothing more than a third party, just like the FSF and
Richard Stallman. This makes your comments no more relevant than those
of any other third party, Richard Stallman and the FSF included.

   Furthermore, it should be clear to anyone who has read your emails
that you are on a personal crusade against Richard Stallman, the FSF and
the *GPL licenses, and that you will post any propaganda that serves
your purpose. Anyone reading your emails should keep this in mind as it
is unclear that you do put Wine's best interests before those of your

Francois Gouget         fgouget at
                           La terre est une bêta...

More information about the wine-devel mailing list