To which freetype should I upgrade? 2.0.6 or earlier

[Michael Stefaniuc]

On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 07:54:14AM -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
> and while we are on the subject what is the philosophy on ifdefing header
> files?
> 
> (I have freetype 2.0.1 from RedHat 7.1 so this morning's build failed
> because I don't have the trig stuff.)
> 
> If we test for a header file and only include it if it is present should we
> be putting similar ifdefs around the code that required the header and
> providing alternatives when it is not present, or specifying that it NEEDS
> to exist?
I had the same problem this morning and updated to freetype-2.0.3 from
Red Hat Linux 7.2 and it works again.

bye
	michael
-- 
Michael Stefaniuc               Tel.: +49-711-96437-199
System Administration           Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat GmbH                    Email: mstefani at redhat.de
Hauptstaetterstr. 58            http://www.redhat.de/
D-70178 Stuttgart
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20020129/74d10b13/attachment.pgp