Road to 0.9

[Dimitrie O. Paun]

On March 19, 2002 12:48 pm, Andreas Mohr wrote:
 >
> > The point is not to freeze the protocol completely, it will clearly
> > continue to evolve even after 1.0. The idea is that once the protocol
> > is declared frozen all future changes are done in a way that preserves
> > backwards compatibility. And the mechanisms to do that are mostly in
> > place now, which is what I mean by saying it is finished.
>
> OK, so in other words the wineserver *is* more or less "independent from
> such changes".

How can that be? What we want is that DLLs compiled with 1.x, work (at the 
binary level) with any 1.y server, where x <= y, right?

-- 
Dimi.