Road to 0.9

[Michael Cardenas]

Francois Gouget wrote:

>On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Michael Cardenas wrote:
>
>    The problem is that if the application does not crash it is likely to
>stay up indefinitely waiting for you to do something...
>   Rather than automating the testing, it may be better to automate the
>process of updating Wine. This can be done completely unattended and can
>thus be done daily. Maybe a procedure documenting how to do this would
>be useful.
>
While I think this is a great idea for people who use their apps every 
day, it still depends on having a bunch of testers.

It would be trivial to have your script killall wine after 5 minutes of 
it sitting there waiting for you. My main concern was that a seg fault 
doesn't necessarily mean that the app will terminate. Also, this only 
checks that apps can launch, not that they are functional in any way. A 
combination of both approaches would be helpful.