Application Database RFC
tony_lambregts at telusplanet.net
Sat May 4 01:45:15 CDT 2002
Jeremy White wrote:
>>I agree with Andi. Too much useless, redundant data. If you have an
>>issue with Wine, submit it to Bugzilla (bugs.winehq.com). Bugzilla is
>>where Wine bugs belong. The AppDB has to only answer a few simple
>>questions. "Does my app work?" and "How well does my app work?".
>I also agree strongly. The old app db failed in part, imo, because
>it tried to gather too much data.
>I wanted to bring up one enhancement that many people I've
>talked to feel would be a very important improvement to
>the appdb: get more 'Lawsons'.
>The idea is if we can get someone to do for each app in the
>appdb what Lawson does for Juno, then I believe that Wine
>will truly start to fly.
>So, I guess the concept is sort of an 'owner', or maybe a
>team of owners for each app. An ideal owner would be someone
> a) Uses the app everyday.
> b) Uses the app fairly broadly and depends on it.
> c) Is willing to periodically try CVS builds of Wine
> and to report regressions.
>Further, if we can get an owner for each app who actually
>uses it, then I think that person would get the opportunity
>to rate it, and their rating would weigh more heavily than
>all the other comments.
This is exactly what I am talking about but we are coming at it from
different directions. The way I see it the rating page would be the
responsability of the app owners. I don't want to rate MS Word because
I dont use it. I can rate the apps that I use and the amount of work to
do this right is small. I would be willing to"adopt" one or two apps if
they were important enough. Maybe others would feel the same way. The
reason for having this is so that we have a consistant criteria from one
app to the next. I don't want a hundred users giving an opinion. I want
a way of measuring/quantifying how we are doing.
More information about the wine-devel