winver configurability - was Re: winhelp mapping
rizsanyi at neobee.net
Wed May 22 19:25:07 CDT 2002
On Wednesday 22 May 2002 21:30, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Clearly we will need to do 2/ anyway for people who don't have a copy
> of Windows around. At some point it may be a good idea to support the
> NT winhlp32 too; I don't think we should try to support Win98 type
> message passing.
I had read much about that some win98 type features would not be supported
only the NT types, and I'm wondering, why is then still the
--winver win95 option is the default.
I would think that then the --winver nt40 should be the default option, and if
somebody needs, then he should explicitly say that he wants win95.
But at least it would be nice if we could configure the winver from the
Is there any reason not to do it?
More information about the wine-devel