Making documentation - was RE: Docu updates question..
speeddymon at yahoo.com
Fri Nov 8 15:00:14 CST 2002
--- Tony Lambregts <tony_lambregts at telusplanet.net> wrote:
> Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
> >Like Vincent said, the most convenient form of the doc (I think), fails
> >when you do :
> >>2b. make html
> >See bug #688 http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688
> When I run "./make_winehq" (with the docbook packages installed) it
> produces the html files in wine-doc with meaningfull names but "make
> html" produces xNNNN files (just like bug report) so make_winehq is the
> prefered method, yes? Is it realy a bug then?
> I think that at the beginning of the document we had a getting started
> section. This section would tell the developer that they needed to
> install have jade, tetex, docbook and perl installed in order to create
> html, pdf, and ps files from the sgml files. There should be links to
> the section on what is required for the various distrbutions and what
> command to run (./make_winhq).
> Right now there is only the section for RedHat . I would be really nice
> if we had sections for other distributions as well
> The sections on setting up the docbook from section 126.96.36.199 on needs
> work since it contains a lot of sections that are incomplete and to a
> large extent it is unclear (to me) what is required.
> As I pointed out before there is a bug about this
Right, I have it in my TODO
P.S. I will probably end up rewriting a lot of the docs to get them to a
usable state, but it will take some time.
Dimi: If you could post on the Wine 0.9 v0.x that a backup docs guy is
needed, it would be greatly appreciated.
Do you Yahoo!?
U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos
More information about the wine-devel