some ismbc* functions: third try
dmitry at baikal.ru
Sun Nov 17 01:26:53 CST 2002
"Greg Turner" <gmturner007 at ameritech.net> wrote:
> totally untested, but it does compile, and seems logical
> enough. while i was at it, i added a few more.
Probably it would be better to create a common internal
function which accepts C1_???? flags, does all remaining
common operations with converting character(s) to unicode
and returns (ctype & flags) != 0?
More information about the wine-devel