some ismbc* functions: third try

Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry at
Sun Nov 17 01:26:53 CST 2002

"Greg Turner" <gmturner007 at> wrote:

> totally untested, but it does compile, and seems logical
> enough.  while i was at it, i added a few more.

Probably it would be better to create a common internal
function which accepts C1_???? flags, does all remaining
common operations with converting character(s) to unicode
and returns (ctype & flags) != 0?


More information about the wine-devel mailing list