Configure question
Martin Wilck
Martin.Wilck at Fujitsu-Siemens.com
Tue Nov 19 09:17:53 CST 2002
Am Die, 2002-11-19 um 15.17 schrieb Patrik Stridvall:
> One thing that you shouldn't assume is for example that
> if a function exists its reentrant variant exists as well.
Sure, got that.
> And yes, you really should use the
> reentrent variant if present as well as having an
> alternative implementation if not.
Hmm - really really always? This generates messy code,
and a lot of effort for very rare cases.
I think we need a compromise, something in the line of either
- a) use non-reentrant functions, protecting them with a critical
section (IMO ok for rarely called functions) or
- b) use only reentrant and treat the case where these aren't
available like the case where the respective functions aren't
available at all.
Of course b) would only be viable if a sufficiently large portion of
systems that support the non-reentrant variant support the reentrant one
as well. I have no idea whether that's the case for the getpwXYZ
functions.
> As to the implict existance question: I'm not sure.
> First of all, to answer the related question:
> Should you have a alternative implementation for
> defined(HAVE_GETPWUID) && !defined(HAVE_GETPWNAM)?
>
> IMHO the answer is no. It is not worth the effort to
> support hypotetical platforms unless we can verify the
> existance of one.
Very true. Perhaps the practical way would be to assume
HAVE_GETPWUID == HAVE_GETPWNAM and see whether someone with
a really strange platform complains (but see below).
> I suggest that we should detect the presence or absence
> of ALL function we use that is verified not to exist on
> some platform and have for example code like
>
> #if defined(HAVE_GETPWUID) || defined(HAVE_GETPWNAM) ||
> defined(HAVE_GETPWENT)
> # if (defined(HAVE_GETPWUID) + defined(HAVE_GETPWNAM) +
> defined(HAVE_GETPWENT)) == 3
> # define __HAVE_GETPW
> # else
> # error All or none of the functions getpwuid, getpwnam and getpwent are
> assumed to exist
> # endif
> #endif
>
> in order to formalize the assumptions and generate a common define to use in
> the code.
Well I'd say that for a start we could simply do something like
/* CAUTION: If there turns out to be some insane platform that has
* getpwuid() but not getpwnam() and getpwent(), this must be
* improved.
*/
#define __HAVE_GETPW HAVE_GETPWUID
This would keep bloat out of configure in the first place, while
providing a generic __HAVE_GETPW macro for possible later use.
Martin
--
Martin Wilck Phone: +49 5251 8 15113
Fujitsu Siemens Computers Fax: +49 5251 8 20409
Heinz-Nixdorf-Ring 1 mailto:Martin.Wilck at Fujitsu-Siemens.com
D-33106 Paderborn http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com/primergy
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list