the dreaded rpcss patch (rpc_J_PL0)

Alexandre Julliard julliard at
Tue Nov 19 20:36:43 CST 2002

Greg Turner <gmturner007 at> writes:

> Still hoping for some guidance on this.  I'm happy to get rid of 
> atomicity.c as you suggest, but less happy about duplicating the (to be 
> renamed) named_pipe_kludge_client.c unit.  The prospect of keeping two 
> identical units in sync just rubs me the wrong way... it's so blatantly 
> non-orthagonal --- it seems, to me, that there must be a better way.

Do you really need the client connection stuff in rpcss?  As far as I
can tell it doesn't really do much, I'd suggest getting rid of it
somehow, and having the client part only in rpcrt4 and the server part
only in rpcss.

Alexandre Julliard
julliard at

More information about the wine-devel mailing list