Bug #321: dlls/msvct/vf[w]printf functions (Patch 2)

[Jaco Greeff]

David Laight wrote:
> Also be aware that strncpy/strncat are required to zero out the
> unfilled part of the buffer.  This is a performance penalty you
> don't (normmaly) want.  

Yes, and we don't really want the performance penalty in this case. In 
my last patch I've refrained from using strncat(x, y, 1), rather using 
strcat(x, y). There are other ways of doing this, i.e. strcat in this 
case might not be the best/fastest, my first priority is getting the 
stuff acceptable to all and into cvs and then making incremental 
adjustments to squeeze the most out of it.

Greetings,
Jaco