IDL/header issues

Alexandre Julliard julliard at
Thu Oct 31 19:00:21 CST 2002

Ove Kaaven <ovehk at> writes:

> IDL-generated files would also eventually obsolete all the current
> wine/obj_*.h files, but those obj_* files seem to be somewhat more
> logically structured than MS's own IDL files, should we craft Wine's IDL
> files accordingly, and maybe have some top-level .idl files in include/
> and some sub-.idl files under include/wine/, like it's done now in e.g.
> objidl.h?

No, I think we should follow the Microsoft way. Sure it's a mess, but
so is the rest of the API anyway... And every time we tried to do
things better than Microsoft we ended up having to revert it.

Alexandre Julliard
julliard at

More information about the wine-devel mailing list