winsock.h portability patch causing portability problem
pfeifer at dbai.tuwien.ac.at
Thu Apr 17 08:20:34 CDT 2003
On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> I am not very proud of the patch below, but would that be an alternate
> solution you could accept, giving your explanation above?
> On FreeBSD, where htonl, htons, ntohl, and ntohs are macros, we won't have
> issues with WINAP, so we can use the definitions provided by the system.
I noticed that you now committed a different patch of your -- As I said,
I fully understood that the one I proposed was ugly. :-) -- and I'm happy
to report that
date: 2003/04/17 02:47:17; author: julliard; state: Exp; lines: +33 -17
Yet another attempt at fixing the htonl functions.
completely solved the problem on FreeBSD.
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer at dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/
More information about the wine-devel