NTPL & pthreads locks
dank at kegel.com
Sun Apr 20 09:17:41 CDT 2003
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> I don't think we can implement Win32 primitives on top of pthreads, at
> least not in a reasonable way. We may be able to do it on top of the
> raw kernel futexes, but that's not exactly libc integration (and it
> will most likely require new kernel features too). And the only reason
> for doing that would be performance, it's certainly not going to make
> things more intuitive or more solid.
Somebody begs to differ. From
* The core threading model has moved to pthreads to decouple WineX from
the continuing changes to certain core system libraries.
If Gav can do it, why can't we? :-)
More information about the wine-devel