On April 22, 2003 01:17 am, Dan Kegel wrote: > It may not be, but at least it brings it into the realm > of Microsoft moves we've seen before. (cf. MFC dlls, which are > never distributed with Windows itself, and may legally > tie all MFC apps to run on Windows alone, if the MFC EULA > holds. Or so I recall.) And the question is: is this enforceable? -- Dimi.