Windows API db / find APIs missing for a given app

[Dave Miller]

I'm afraid you are correct.  My method of identifying stubs is broken. 
 :(  Basically I just select where version = wine and api = $api.  If no 
rows are returned it is unimplemented.  That part seems fine.  Problem 
is when I check status to see if it is "stub".  It seems there are 
multiple entries in the wine spec files.  BitBlt is listed as a stub in 
'display' but it's also cdecl in x11drv, pascal16 is gdi, and stdcall in 
gdi32.    Perhaps I should be limiting my query to the dll which the app 
is trying to import from.  Would that always be correct?

I agree completely.  Non-windows dlls don't belong in the output since 
those API are not provided by windows and will never be implemented in 
wine.  I think it's best if they're removed from the database completely 
rather than having the script ignore them but I'm afraid when many apps 
are added it could become a maintenance nightmare.

Vincent Béron wrote:

>Le lun 04/08/2003 à 10:39, Dimitrie O. Paun a écrit :
>  
>
>>On August 3, 2003 03:38 am, David Miller wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Recently I spent some time on this again and would like anyone interested
>>>in the database to take a look and email me comments.
>>>      
>>>
>>When comparing 'exports' for example, I get this kind of output:
>>...
>>IID_IAVIStream is exported by win98-4.10.1998 and wine
>>IID_IGetFrame is exported by win98-4.10.1998 and wine
>>BitReverseBuf is exported by win98-4.10.1998 only
>>FaxCodecChange is exported by win98-4.10.1998 only
>>...
>>
>>which is fine, but I will drop the similarities:
>>
>>IID_IAVIStream is exported by win98-4.10.1998 and wine
>>IID_IGetFrame is exported by win98-4.10.1998 and wine
>>
>>just output the differences, there are too many anyway.
>>Or have a checkbox to ask the user if they want to see
>>only the differences.
>>    
>>
>
>I checked the unimplemented APIs for vcdeasy, and there are two things:
>- Cygwin's dlls (cygz, cygjpeg6b, cygxml2-2, cygwin1) are listed, when
>they're not part of a Windows installation. You should try to separate
>what's part of Windows (any version), and what can be found elsewhere
>(from an application, a toolkit, etc.).
>- Also, in gdi32, BitBlt and StretchBlt are marked as stubs. I have a
>hard time believing that. What's your method to identify stubs?
>
>Vincent
>
>
>
>
>  
>