PATCH: Get rid of superfluous dup() and close() calls.

[Dan Kegel]

Martin Wilck wrote:
>>I don't see why it would be hard to close fds, it's just standard
>>resource management, like freeing allocated memory, etc.  If the async
>>I/O code makes this hard to do then the code is broken.
> 
> 
> Asynchronous IO, broken or not, allows for hundreds of simultaneous IO
> operations on a single HANDLE, and therefore gets us into *resource
> shortage* as long as we use up an fd for each such operation.

Is your main objection to the current scheme based on performance?
- Dan

-- 
Dan Kegel
http://www.kegel.com
http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045