2GB visible partition size

[Duane Clark]

Tony Lambregts wrote:
> Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>>
>>Well, yes, if we really need to change the fstype it should be a
>>generic option that allows all types to be specified, not just
>>NTFS. And it shouldn't overload the existing "type" parameter, it
>>should be a separate entry.
>>
> OK. I guess my biggest problem with this is that the most obvious name 
> for this entry is "Filesytem" which is already used <g>.

Since the parameter of interest is specifically named "fsname" rather 
than "fstype" or "Filesystem", perhaps that should be the configurable 
parameter name. I would think that would eliminate any confusion.