winemaker problem
Jeff Smith
whydoubt at hotmail.com
Thu Jan 2 06:47:25 CST 2003
Yes there should be. Currently execname.so is being created rather than
execname.exe.so. The patch I submitted a few hours ago (don't know
if it has made it through yet) includes a fix for this.
Copying the file is actually what I did for several weeks, rather than
dig in to winemaker to fix the problem. But I get fed up and started
putting together a patch for this several days ago. So now it is ready
to roll. Good timing, yes?
-- Jeff S
>From: Shachar Shemesh <wine-devel at sun.consumer.org.il>
>
>Shouldn't there be a winemine-hcs.exe.so file there?
>If you rename winemine-hcs.so to winemine-hcs.exe.so, what happens?
>
> Shachar
>
>Hans Christian Studt wrote:
>
>>It still cannot find 'winemine-hcs.exe'.
>>What seems to comes nearest is
>>-rwxr-xr-x 969 jan 1 21:00 winemine-hcs
>>-rwxrwxr-x 793446 jan 1 21:00 winemine-hcs.so
>>-rw-rw-r-- 44160 jan 1 21:00 winemine-hcs.spec.c
>>-rw-rw-r-- 92648 jan 1 21:00 winemine-hcs.spec.o
>>-rw-rw-r-- 173 jan 1 20:59 winemine.exe.dbg.c
>>-rw-rw-r-- 2040 jan 1 21:00 winemine.exe.dbg.o
>>-rw-rw-r-- 43665 jan 1 15:39 winemine.exe.spec.c
>>
>>I sure hope someone can help out - because I plan to try to see if I can
>>make some of those 7.000 win32 applications over at sourceforge.net
>>compile under winelib.
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list