distcc and wine
dank at kegel.com
Thu Jan 9 14:22:12 CST 2003
Martin Pool wrote:
> On 8 Jan 2003, Dan Kegel <dank at kegel.com> wrote:
>>I think the issue was that I did not have three identical machines;
>>the speedup from distributing to three hosts was minimal compared
>>to just building on the fast machine.
> I think the scheduler doesn't handle the case of heterogenous machines
> as well as it might. I'm going to try to fix that.
> You should make sure that the fastest machines are listed first in
OK, so if I'm running the build on the fast host,
I should include 'localhost' first in DISTCC_HOSTS.
But what about SMP machines? If the fast machine
is a dual processor box, and the others are all
single-processor, should I put localhost twice in DISTCC_HOSTS?
That's probably part of the reason I got such a poor
speedup -- I had no idea how to configure distcc
well in the first place, let alone configuring
it to deal with SMP systems.
Linux User #78045
More information about the wine-devel