Wintab: Update on debugging & demo patch.
7ownq0k402 at sneakemail.com
Thu Jun 26 11:04:40 CDT 2003
Aric Stewart aric-at-codeweavers.com |Wine Mailing Lists| wrote:
> I chatted with Alexandre yesterday and he expressed a number of concerns
> with how my patch works. He and I are going to work on make that patch
> suitable for winehq. Then i will get that applied. It should not change
> any of the functionality. Just trying to preserve DLL separation.
Can you discuss a bit further what the separation issues are.
I did some thinking about this when I was initially discussing a wintab
Might be a useful reference for other people looking at dll separation
> Then i will work with your patch to get that stuff in as well. One,
> thing.. could you do add a -w to your diff so that we can ignore the
> changes in white space. that will cause the patch to be smaller and
> easier for me to see what changes you made.
Ok, so you'll integrate the patches I sent.
One suggestion: When you apply the patches, re-work the
Packet reading functions to make the flush vs. read functionality
clearer. My patch doesn't make the difference clear to the casual
If you want I could do this re-working after you've posted your new patch.
I will work up some fixes to the Photoshop, and Painter issues with the
current code, and release patches aganist your forthcoming patch.
.... Unless you want to do that?
More information about the wine-devel