wine/ tools/winewrap.c tools/winegcc.c include ...

Alexandre Julliard julliard at
Mon Mar 31 22:31:56 CST 2003

"Dimitrie O. Paun" <dpaun at> writes:

> However, if we are to depend on winegcc/winewrap, we need to be able
> to compile it anyway, no? And since it has a well defined semantics 
> (that's much more commonly available than the fork/exec), it's not 
> necessarily a bad addition. 

Yes, it's just that I don't like to add non-Unix APIs to the
portability layer, but I guess there are good reasons for making
an exception here.

Alexandre Julliard
julliard at

More information about the wine-devel mailing list