julliard at winehq.org
Wed May 14 17:11:58 CDT 2003
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <dimi at intelliware.ca> writes:
> I see two possibilities:
> 1. Look in the same dir as the .exe.so for the .dll.so
> 2. Fix the constructor thing properly, and avoid the wrapper
> For 2, I'm not even sure what we need to do. You promissed some liker
> magic and eblow greese some time ago, but other than that...
I think the problems that the wrapper was supposed to solve are solved
by using a .exe.so already. There may be some remaining issues with
the constructor order but you will have these with the wrapper too. So
I'd say let's just kill it and see what happens.
julliard at winehq.com
More information about the wine-devel