Alexandre Julliard julliard at
Sat May 17 17:42:52 CDT 2003

"Gregory M. Turner" <gmturner007 at> writes:

> I guess the first question to ask, before all of the above is: which is a 
> worse sacrifice for wine?  Requiring compiler support for this, or an extra 
> parsing phase?  Or just having a broken dummy implementation like we do now?  

For Winelib apps, the solution is to add support to the compiler. For
IDL-generated code, the solution is to make our IDL compiler generate
code that uses the existing __TRY macros (or even generates the C code
directly without using the macros if this allows more optimizations).

Alexandre Julliard
julliard at

More information about the wine-devel mailing list