Protected mode interrupt problem
Jukka Heinonen
jhei at iki.fi
Wed Oct 8 01:27:08 CDT 2003
On Tue, Oct 07, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Well, the patch is doing a kind of lazy initialisation, since it falls
> back to the global vector if the task one is 0. We could possibly set
> the task vector at that point, but it's not clear to me that it would
> be necessary.
Now that you mention it, the patch indeed does lazy intialization.
I really should try to avoid doing anything that requires thinking
when I'm tired... So, patch looks correct, after all and I don't
think setting task vectors would be useful, either.
--
Jukka Heinonen <http://www.iki.fi/jhei/>
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list