[ANN] Conformance testing campaign
Jakob Eriksson
jakob at vmlinux.org
Wed Sep 3 15:19:03 CDT 2003
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> -- I don't think we need to _distribute_ two binaries. If the
> MSVC one works better, the person designated to build and
> publicly post the winetests.exe should build the tests
> through MSVC. Once we fix everything so that MinGW works
> just as well, we might as well switch to that.
>
>How does that sound?
>
>
Great, except if MSVC tests are the ones that work and the only ones
that are
used, there is little incentice to fix mingw. I think we really have to
look at mingw
and Wine as part of a greater whole. *)
Having two winetests.exe or one compound winetests.exe with both sets of
tests in
it helps not only track down bugs in Wine, but also helps mingw become more
MSVC conformant.
I could easily extend winetests.exe to also include the MSVC compiled
tests and run
them, for instance, before the mingw compiled ones.
regards,
Jakob
*) Each benefitting the other.
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list